Elon Musk Responds to Twitter’s Lawsuit Over $44 Billion Deal


Mr. Musk formally answered to Twitter’s try to drive him to raise the agency, arguing that there turn into as soon as no motive to bustle the case.

Elon Musk, the world’s richest man, filed a response to Twitter on Friday after the company sued him to go through with an acquisition.
Credit score rating…Reuters/Shannon Stapleton

Elon Musk accused Twitter on Friday of deceiving him about its service, obfuscating particulars and now not notifying him of govt changes, in his first formal response to the agency’s lawsuit geared towards forcing him to stop a $44 billion acquisition of the social media service.

Legal professionals for Mr. Musk, who struck the blockbuster deal to raise Twitter in April nonetheless has since tried to discontinuance the acquisition, made the arguments in a merely submitting meant to oppose the agency’s question of for a four-day trial in September inside the case.

Twitter is dashing to court docket docket after “a two-month relish hunt of delays, technical bottlenecks, evasive solutions and, lastly, refusals,” Mr. Musk’s legal professionals acknowledged inside the submitting. They added that Twitter turn into as soon as in search of to “conceal the reality” over spurious accounts on the service, a wretchedness that Mr. Musk has made central to his want to drag out of the deal.

Twitter had requested a September trial because of Mr. Musk turn into as soon as ensuing from stop his deal to raise the agency by Oct. 24. Mr. Musk’s legal professionals proposed a February date for a trial instead, noting that the deal time limit robotically extends inside the event of litigation. The banks which consider devoted to abet fund the deal consider promised that financing via April 25, 2023.

Mr. Musk’s merely submitting turn into as soon as a forceful rebuke of Twitter’s accusations that he turn into as soon as in search of to unjustly stop the acquisition. In its lawsuit this week, Twitter acknowledged Mr. Musk had “knowingly, intentionally, willfully and materially breached” his settlement to raise the agency by falsely claiming that he turn into as soon as now not getting information in regards to the incidence of spurious accounts on the service.

The next merely battle ensures to be grotesque and extended. The abet-and-forth between the two aspects had already escalated for weeks sooner than landing in court docket docket. Mr. Musk has made barbed feedback in regards to the agency and constantly puzzled the incidence of spurious accounts on the platform. Fraudulent accounts are feeble to unfold direct mail or manipulate Twitter’s service by falsely boosting traits, and are on the entire automated as a trade of flee by actual of us.

At one degree, Mr. Musk tweeted that the maintain Twitter turn into as soon as on protect. His actions coincided with a meander inside the model of tech shares, together with these of Tesla, the electrical carmaker that Mr. Musk leads and that is the precept provide of his wealth.

Twitter has maintained that it has labored with Mr. Musk to close the deal and is intent on seeing the sale via. Throughout the deal settlement, Twitter and Mr. Musk consider a so-known as particular effectivity clause that permits the agency to sue to drive the deal via, as lengthy as a result of the debt that the billionaire has corralled for the acquisition is in state of affairs.

A Twitter spokesman declined to remark.

Ann Lipton, a professor of company governance at Tulane Legislation Faculty, acknowledged it turn into as soon as clear why Twitter turn into as soon as transferring with tempo and Mr. Musk wasn’t.

“The Twitter board has each curiosity in getting this settled swiftly, and he has each curiosity in lengthen — time is money,” she acknowledged. Of Mr. Musk, she added, “He’s going to need to rep as exceptional discovery as possible and elevate as exceptional time up as possible, in truth inserting the potential of the litigation itself and, as time goes on, the uncertainty related to it to drive some fashion of settlement or backing down.”

Throughout the merely submitting, Mr. Musk’s legal professionals reiterated a lot of the arguments that that they had made this month when the billionaire acknowledged he meant to discontinuance the deal.

Twitter did now not habits a rigorous rely of spurious accounts and stymied Mr. Musk’s efforts to treasure how direct mail turn into as soon as tallied, the submitting acknowledged. “Musk turn into as soon as flabbergasted to be taught precise how meager Twitter’s course of turn into as soon as,” the submitting acknowledged, noting that the agency feeble of us to find out the ideas as a trade of machine finding out.

Mr. Musk tried getting additional information from Twitter about spurious accounts, the submitting added, nonetheless the agency “intentionally erected synthetic roadblocks and pissed off defendants’ efforts.”

To resolve how Twitter counts spurious accounts, Mr. Musk needed months of discovery and dozens of depositions, his legal professionals acknowledged. Mr. Musk has contended that Twitter’s public disclosures that spurious accounts are round 5 p.c of titillating prospects are misleading. Unsuitable figures will even be a “self-discipline material adversarial stop” below the deal’s phrases and allow Mr. Musk to traipse away, his legal professionals acknowledged, arguing that the numbers bear “directly on Twitter’s doable model to prospects and advertisers.”

Twitter has made errors with its specific particular person numbers sooner than, Mr. Musk’s legal professionals acknowledged. In April, the agency acknowledged it had overcounted its titillating prospects from 2019 to 2021.

Twitter moreover breached the phrases of the deal by now not too way back firing two excessive executives with out warning Mr. Musk and now not working industrial as a result of it often would, his legal professionals acknowledged.

The agency acknowledged in its go well with that it had notified Mr. Musk’s legal professionals in regards to the 2 executives and that the legal professionals had “raised no objection.”

Twitter and Mr. Musk are scheduled for a listening to on the case on Tuesday at Chancery Court docket in Delaware, the place the agency filed its lawsuit in direction of the billionaire. The chancellor of the court docket docket, Kathaleen St. J. McCormick, has been assigned to supervise the case, and might perchance nicely peaceful make the most of whether or not or now not to tempo the case alongside, as Twitter has requested, or lengthen it for Mr. Musk.

If the go well with strikes to trial, Mediate McCormick will resolve whether or not or now not Mr. Musk should shut the deal. She will additionally moreover let Mr. Musk traipse away whereas forcing him to pay damages. By many readings of Twitter’s contract with Mr. Musk, damages might perchance be capped at $1 billion. The 2 aspects can even moreover resolve or renegotiate the deal.

Twitter has misplaced only a few third of its model since Mr. Musk signed the deal to raise the agency for $54.20 a fraction. The agency is scheduled to doc its quarterly earnings subsequent Friday.